- Bellringers require commitment on your part so that it becomes part of the expected beginning-of-classroom routine.
- I am AMAZED by how focused students are after the bellringer is completed compared to when I did not implement them previously.
- The whole bellringer time should take 10 minutes - I give 5 minutes for students to complete it (while I take attendance) and 5 minutes to go over the bellringer as a class. My class periods are 53 minutes.
- The bellringer itself needs to connect with the current unit/lesson. The point of the bellringer is to activate current background knowledge needed for the day's lesson or to reinforce past knowledge.
- Bellringers are a source of input, so they need to be COMPREHENSIBLE! If they are not, then input disruptions occur, and the brain will toss out what it does not understand.
- Bellringers do not need to involve critical thinking/higher order thinking - the goal is just to transition students into an academic frame of mind.
- Bellringers need to be "easy" so that students feel successful with them. When students feel successful with bellringers, they are more apt to buy into them.
- Much like classroom activities, bellringers need to be scaffolded accordingly.
- I allow students to have their phones/listening devices out during the 5 minutes when they are completing the bellringer, but when that time is up and we are ready to go over it, I then begin my cell phone ritual.
- Bellringers need to involve students writing them down and interacting with them. I require students to have a composition book solely for bellringers. Partly I do this to ensure that students are doing the bellringer, but mainly more because...
- I use bellringers as a time to toss in pop-up theory! Daily I tell students, "Please write down the bellringer. Whenever you write down understandable messages in Latin, your brain makes a connection. That which the brain does not understand, it throws out. If there is a word which you do not understand, ask me so that your brain can start making a connection with that word!" I am sure that students are sick of hearing me say that lol.
A recovering grammar-translation Latin teacher's journey into Comprehensible Input
Monday, October 14, 2024
My Journey into Bellringers
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
Smashdoodles
This is a great post-reading activity, and I feel like I have come totally late to the party on this one. A Smashdoodle is a way for students to interact with a reading, to demonstrate comprehension, and to summarize these interactions in various ways. It is called a Smashdoodle, because essentially, one is "smashing together" various components of a reading in one place to demonstrate comprehension, reflection, and/or higher order thinking. A Smashdoodle can be done digitally on a slide or on paper. Students can create a poster summarizing different parts of the text, fill out a foldable graphic organizer, or fill out boxes on a sheet of paper.
You can ask WHATEVER questions you want on a Smashdoodle, but the purpose is that the artifact is a holistic summary of the text. Possible questions to address - students can answer this as written sentences or as images (digital or drawn):
- Copy five sentences which best summarize the text.
- Who are the characters in this reading?
- Where is the location of the reading?
- Draw a picture which summarizes the reading
- Write down any words from the reading which are new to you
- Write down (parts of speech) from the reading.
- Reflection questions
- I learned that…
- I was surprised/shocked to learn that…
- I found it interesting that
Below is my first attempt at a Smashdoodle - it is very basic and on paper:
As I said, there are SO many different ways to do a Smashdoodle, and I feel that others explain it so much better than I do (and they have student examples to show). Below are some blog posts from where I learned how to do a Smashdoodle:- Scott Benedict Smashdoodle write up
- Martina Bex Smashdoodle write up
- John Piazza Smashdoodle write up
- Elizabeth Detlinger Smashdoodle write up
Wednesday, October 2, 2024
Backwards Design for a Reading - CI Summit Example
A HUGE question which many novice CI/ADI practitioners ask is "I have readings/authentic literary resources in my textbook which I need to cover. How does one lesson plan for a reading?" This is a really good question which we experienced CI/ADI teachers/trainers need to do a better job of addressing, because so often at conferences and trainings while we may teach skills and demonstrate various strategies, we leave out this very important component.
The key to lesson planning a reading is backwards design, but to be honest, it can actually be a very detailed process. I originally learned this from Karen Rowan years ago (and she may have learned it from someone else) as well as from others in recent years. I have found that although this process can appear onerous, it really does provide a good map for where to go and what to cover. My goal is that when students see the actual textbook/literary/ authentic reading, 98%-100% is already comprehensible to them.
Mons Vesuvius erat mons iratus in Italia antiqua. Pompeii erat urbs in Italia antiqua per litora. Quod Pompeii erat urbs per litora, erat urbs popularis! Multi homines iverunt ad visitandos Pompeiios, quod Pompeii erat per litora.
Sed Mons Vesuvius erupit, et urbs Pompeii deleta est! Sed cum Mons Vesuvius eruperit, mons iratus multam terram addidit! Pompeii non iam erat per litora, sed erat procul a litore!
Hodie, Pompeii est urbs in ruinis. Multi homines ad urbem Pompeios eunt ad visitandas ruinas.
Mons Vesuvius adhuc est mons iratus activus! In futuro, Mons Vesuvius erupiet! In futuro, multi urbes in monte et per litora deleti erunt!
- I wrote the cultural passage first. Since these were novice-low Latin learners, my emphasis was on “sheltering/limiting vocabulary,” with the intent of lots of repetitions and predictable sentences/structures. In addition, I made a conscious effort of utilizing as many cognates as possible
- I made a list of EVERY vocabulary word/phrase in the passage and categorized them as follows:
- I determined which words I would TPR/gesture - mons iratus, per litora, iverunt
- I determined which words I would use as a password - deleta/deleti sunt.
- Using the words which i determined for a preview vocabulary story, I wrote a “silly story”
- I determined which words I would gloss and provide the L1 meaning in the cultural reading. Because I only had a few 30-minute sessions of Latin before revealing the cultural reading, I felt that I glossed a lot more words than I normally would have. If I had one more Latin session, I would have been able to target many of the glossed words.
- I determined the activities to be used with this story
- I determined how to introduce the cultural reading
- Day 1 (15 minutes) - TPR/Gestures, TPR/Gestures with Story
- Day 2 (30 minutes) - Password at the Door, Review of TPR Gestures, What is Behind the Door, Readers Theater of "Silly Story"
- Day 3 (30 minutes) - Post Reading of Silly Story - SEL Reading, Is this Relevant to the Story, Hot Potato
- Day 4 (25 minutes)- Cultural Reading, Read/Draw/ Discuss
- Why did I not use an authentic resource about the eruption of Mount Vesuvius and the destruction of Pompeii? My primary goal was comprehensibility and readability. If you know of an authentic Latin resource which communicates this event for NOVICE-LOW learners, please let me know!
- I think too many times CI/ADI critics get caught up in an assumption that all we CI/ADI teachers do is focus on "silly stories" and never do anything beyond that. While I can understand that misconception, my use of a "silly story" was very deliberate and was to preview vocabulary and sentence structures which participants would experience in the cultural reading. In other words, it was part of the process and not the end goal.